Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 474 Download : 271

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study was conducted during the two growing seasons (2018 and 2019) in Date Palm Trees Station-Al-Hussinya District-Horticulture and, Department of Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture, Karbala Governorate. Two cultivars of date palm trees Zahdi and Khistawi were studied. The 27 palm trees for each cultivars were randomly selected, homogeneous in vegetative growth and similar in size and shape. The results showed that the Zahdi cultivar recorded a significant increase in the content of chlorophyll and proline which reached 0.939 mg.g-1 and 12.854. g-1, respectively. The Khistawi cultivar recorded a significant difference in the carbohydrate content of leaf which reached 9.564 µg.g-1 compared to Zahdi cultivar. The results were also showed that superiority of the concentration was 1 g. L-1. palm -1 in all studied characteristics. The study showed that in the concentration of 2 g. L-1. Palm-1 of disper osmotic had significant difference in the most of studied characteristics. Bilateral and triple inequalities have a significant moral effect in all studied characteristics.

Keywords

Date palm Nano-fertilization Disper osmotic Chemical Mineral properties

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Abd, A. M., Altemimy, I. H. ., & Altemimy, H. M. . (2020). Evaluation of the Effect of Nano-Fertilization and Disper Osmotic in Treating the Salinity of Irrigation Water on the Chemical and Mineral Properties of Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.(. Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.37077/25200860.2020.33.1.06
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al-Jawari, N.S.H . (2004). Soaking of Triticum aestivum with ethylene glycol and its effect on growth, productivity and increased endurance of frozen. M. Sc. Thesis, Coll. Educ., Univ. Mosul: 75pp.
  2. Allen, V.B & David J.P. (2007). Handbook of Plant Nutrition. Taylor and Francis group. Boca Raton. New York: 125pp.
  3. Black, C.A. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. part 1. Physical properties. Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin: 96pp.
  4. Cresser, M.S. & Parsons, J.W. (1979). Sulphuric Perchloric and digestion of plant material for the determination of nitrogen, phosphorus potassium, calcium and magnesium. Anal. Chem. Acta, 109: 431-436.
  5. Davarpanaha, S. Tehranifara A.; Hossein, Gh.; Nejada, D.; Abadíab, J & Khorasan, R. (2016). Effects of foliar applications of zinc and boron nano-fertilizers onpomegranate (Punica granatum cv. Ardestani) fruit yield and quality. Sci. Hortic., 210: 57-64.
  6. Dudal, R. & Roy, R.N. (1995). Integrated Plant Nutrition Systems. F.A.O. pp378.
  7. Crills, K.A.; Hamiltor, J.K.; Rebers, D.A. & Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and substances. Anal. Chem., 28: 350-356.
  8. Fathi A.,M. Zahedi and S.Torabian.(2017). Effect of interaction between salinity and nanoparticles (Fe2O3 and ZnO) on physiological parameters of (Zea mays L.) Journal of Plant Nutrition. 40(19):Abstract.
  9. Ibrahim, A.B.O. (2014). Date Palm, Heritage, Food and Medicine. Issa Cultural Center: 327pp.In Arabic .
  10. Joly, C. (1993). Mineral Fertilizers: Plant Nutrient Content, Formulation and Efficiency. (cited by Dudal & Roy, 1995).
  11. Kah, M.; Kookana, R.S.; Gogos, A. & Bucheli,Th.D. (2018). A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nature Nanotechnology, 13: 677-684.
  12. Liu, R. & Lai, R. (2015). Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci. Total Environ., 514(1): 131-139.
  13. Ma, X.? Geiser-Lee, J.? Deng , Y. & Kolmakov, A. (2010). Interactions engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: Phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Sci. Total Environ., 408(16): 3053-3061.
  14. Murphy, T. & Riley, J.R. (1962). A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chem. Acta, 27: 31- 36.
  15. Page, A.L.; Miller, R.H. & Kenney, D.R. (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part, 2nd ed. Madison Son, Wisconsin: 1159pp.
  16. Parther, R.J.; Goertzen, J.O.; Rhoades, J.D. & Frenkel, H. (1978). Efficient amendment use in sodic soil reclamation. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 42: 782 -786.
  17. Saad, T.M.; Abdul Karim, H.A. & Kazim, A.H. (2016). Effect of level and date of addition of agricultural sulfur in some chemical characteristics of soil before planting and at harvest of two cultivars of wheat. Al-Muthanna J. Agric. Sci., 4(2): 1-15.
  18. Sahoki, M.M. & Wahib, K. (1990). Applications in the Design and Analysis of Experiments. Dar Al Hekma For Printing & Publishing. Univ. Mosul: 488pp.
  19. Saleh, M.M.S. (2015). Nanotechnology and a New Scientific Era. King Fahd National Library. Riyadh: 246pp.
  20. Singh, N.B.; Amist, N.; Yadav, K.; Singh, D.; Pandey, J. K. & Singh S. C. (2013). Zinc oxide nanoparticles as fertilizer for the germination, growth and metabolism of vegetable crops. J. Nano Eng. Nanomanufact., 3(4): 53-364.
  21. Subramanian, K.S.; Paulraj, C. & Natarajan, S. (2008). Nanotechnological approaches in nutrient management. Nanotechnology applications in agriculture. TNAU Tech. Bull., Coimbatore: 246pp.
  22. Troll, W. & Lindsley, J. (1955). A photometric method for determination of proline. J. Biol. Chem., 215: 655-661.
  23. Yaish, M.W. & Kumar, P.P. (2015). Salt tolerance research in date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.), past, present, and future perspectives. Front Plant Sci., 18(6): 348-359.
  24. Yassin, B.T. (1992). Physiology of Water Tension in the Plant. Directorate of Books House for printing and publishing. Univ. Mosul: 386pp.
  25. Zagzog, O.A. & Mohamed, M.G. (2017). Improving growth, flowering, fruiting and resistance of malformation of mango trees using nano-zinc. Middle East J. Agric. Res., 6(3): 673-681.